Practice areas

Civil, Family,

Year of call: 2013

James joined chambers in July 2017 following the successful completion of his pupillage.  James has been commended for his personable style; engaging in court and with clients alike, he translates complex legal matters into comprehensible advice.

“Counsel was excellent in terms of communication and case management at Court, and the client was delighted with the outcome.”

“We are really impressed with his work and his ability to stay on top of cases.”

James accepts instructions in civil and family with a particular emphasis on civil matters involving property, commercial disputes, and personal injury.

Read More

During pupillage, James gained experience in civil, crime, family and immigration hearings, and has continued to expand his practice in civil and family law. Before joining chambers, James worked as a county court advocate. He has since built on his extensive experience in the areas of landlord and tenant, mortgage repossessions, insolvency, contract, personal injury as well all manner of procedural hearings.


James acts for landlords and tenants in possession claims, claims for recovery of service charges, and deposit protection disputes.  James also advises and represents clients in other property matters including leasehold disputes, trespass, mortgage repossessions, boundary disputes and TOLATA claims.  James is regularly instructed in the Small Claims Track, Fast Track and Multi-Track for road traffic accidents, credit hire and holiday sickness claims, which include advising on quantum and drafting pleadings. James has also acted on appeals in the county court under its appellate jurisdiction.

Beyond property and personal injury matters, James has appeared in the County Court and High Court in insolvency and bankruptcy matters, and has a wealth of experience in general contract disputes, and issues of tortious liability.

Recent cases:

  • L v S Ltd (2019) – acting for a claimant in an employer’s liability claim alleging unsafe exposure to vibrations.
  • M v SR (2019) – defeated an application for relief from sanctions at trial and succeeded on all points in a credit hire dispute resulting in the claimant refunding part of an interim payment.
  • O v H (2019) – succeeded in obtaining a generous award for general damages on behalf of a child beating a part 36 offer.
  • RC v M & M (2019) – representing a specialist lender in a long-running possession dispute arising from large loans secured against a number of properties.
  • O Ltd v B Ltd (2019) – acted for a company defending a claim for unpaid invoices and fees which centred on the interpretation of  a non-compete clause. The matter was settled on advcie following a Pre-trial Settlement Hearing.
  • O v O (2019) – negotiated a full concession at trial by the defendant in a claim for an order for sale in repayment of a series of loans. Subsequently succeeded on an application to take carriage of the sale of the property following the failure by the defendant to perform its obligations under the order.
  • H v I (2019) – provided advice and drafted pleadings for a wrongful forfeiture claim seeking injunctive relief and damages. The dispute centred around a sub-lease for restaurant premises which the defendant cenceded following cross examination at trial. Also acted in subsequent enforcement hearings.
  • L v S Ltd (2018) – successfully appealed against a decision to refuse permission to substitute parties after expiry of limitation. The claim was wrongly issued against a previous employer and both the first instance application and appeal involved issues of employer’s liability, TUPE transfers, limitation and QOCS.
  • S v Y-H (2018) – represented the claimant freeholders in a trial for recovery of ground rent and service charges. The claimants were awarded all of the sums claimed and recovered costs under the lease.
  • SS v AP (2018) – defeated an application to set aside judgement and obtained a possession order for the lender on a mortgage of large commercial premises.
  • G & Ors v K & Ors (2018) – acting for freeholders in a claim for injunctive relief and damages relating to interference with an easement by multiple neighbouring landowners.
  • O v O (2018) – represented the claimant in a claim for recovery of loans between family members and successfully negotiated a full settlement at trial.
  • A v L (2018) – represented the landlord in difficult section 8 possession claim and advised on how to remedy defects as well as service of a section 21 notice following the change in regulations.
  • H v I (2018) – provided advice and drafted pleadings for a wrongful forfeiture claim seeking injunctive relief and damages. The dispute centred around a sub-lease for restaurant premises.
  • EP Ltd v P – successfully represented the claimant in an application for an interim possession order over part of retail premises on which trespassers had taken up residence.
  • M v T Ltd (2018) – acted for the claimant defending an application for a finding of fundamental dishonesty after discontinuance.
  • H v H (2018) – acting for a joint owner responding to an application for an order for sale including a claim for occupation rent.
  • S & T v N (2017) – provided advice and representation in relation to TOLATA issues in a dispute between joint owners of property previously the subject of an agreed order for sale.
  • A v G (2017) – advised and represented a Landlord in a deposit protection dispute which centred around the definition of an assured shorthold tenancy and whether the rooms let to the claimant formed ‘part of a building’. A favourable settlement was negotiated part-way through the hearing.
  • C v S (2017) – advised on a boundary dispute involving land purchased for development for which there were a variety of contradictory plans.
  • B Ltd v M (2017) – advised a freeholder on multiple breaches of a covenant against alterations.
  • L Ltd v C (2017) – advised and represented the owner of a ‘guesthouse’ offering long-term lets in a successful trespass claim after an occupier refused to vacate.


James has experience across all areas of family law but is mostly instructed in financial remedy matters. James’ experience in property law makes him well-placed to advise on TOLATA disputes. He has represented clients from the commencement of proceedings and often achieves positive settlements at an early stage. Where this is not possible, he has appeared at final hearings involving a variety of property and pension disputes.

He has acted for all parties in pubic law proceedings at urgent, interim and final hearings. James has also acted for parents and the guardian in private law proceedings. He is available to act in applications for occupation and non-molestation orders.

Recent cases:

  • K v K (2019) – acted for the applicant in a financial remedy final hearing successfully obtaining findings of dishonesty in relation to an international property and loan transaction.
  • F v F (2019) – acting for the respondent in financial remedy matter involving a freezing injunction, an application for mainenance pending suit, and a dispute about management of a family business.
  • A v C (2019) – representing the applicant in an application to vary a financial order.
  • H v H (2019) – advising and representing the respondent in a final hearing and negotiating a settlement allowing retention of the family home and a division of pensions.
  • M v M (2018) – represented the guardian at a final hearing in private law proceedings involving a significant breakdown in the relationship between the children and mother.
  • H v M & J (2018) – acted for a mother with significant cognitive difficulties in public law proceedings.
  • S V S (2018) – representing the wife in financial remedy proceedings involving a large property comprised of several parts for both residential and commercial use.
  • WB v Z (2018) – acted in public law proceedings involving a new-born child for a father with significant learning difficulties and who faced serious allegations of harming unrelated minors.
  • H v N & B (2018) – acted for a mother in public law proceedings during which the local authority completely reversed its care plan without notice.
  • H v E&B (2018) – acted for the father in public law proceedings involving a very young baby for which the care plan was adoption.


  • LLB (Hons) – First class
  • BPTC – Very competent


  • Inner Temple
  • Property Bar Association

Click here for my Personal Privacy Statement